13. June 2007

Staff training for PR and marketing shops

Ongoing employee development gets a polite nod — if that — at most small to mid-sized PR agencies. And that’s a shame, since it’s one of the highest ROI activities agency owners can engage in, along with systemic business development.

While I haven’t worked at endless agencies in my career, a couple of them have been deeply committed to employee development. Additionally, I did a stint at Peter Kiewit Sons’, Inc., a company generally regarded in the construction industry as the leader in terms of employee development. All of which is a long-winded way of saying: I’ve got opinions.

Good training programs follow career arcs. If the first time employees encounter your training is when they’ve been there a few years or gotten promoted into management, then it’s not a good program. Better to have less to offer at each level and something at every level than to aggregate all the training into launchpad stuff like courses for new account execs, supervision 101, etc.

Employees on a track to management (or more specifically, on a track to positions with significant P/L authority) should be trained together no matter how many offices you have to fly them in from. Can’t fit ‘em all into a big hotel meeting room? Then break ‘em into multiple groups but the big idea is to get all these people together to meet and exchange experiences. They’ll learn, but they’ll also forge personal friendships and work relationships that will help the company. If you have an account coordinator making a decision, it’s unlikely to have a huge impact on the company - but a newly minted VP? You want him/her to know lots of other people in the organization so ideas and experiences can be shared.

Read more …

12. June 2007

Value Cascades in PR

A weekend conversation about social media and the value PR brings to the table got me thinking about our industry’s value cascade — how we transmit value to clients and employers under the best scenarios, vs some less-than-best variants. Here’s what I think it looks like on the consulting side:

Ideally, we deliver expertise, which drives the formation of custom strategies. These strategies, combined with access, deliver results and value.

If we lack any one of the three legs of the proverbial stool, we can still make things work, albeit with different approaches. Read more …

25. April 2005

Marketing the mundane

Vintage Engage - content from Engage 1.0Friend and uber-flack Peter Shankman (professional, personal, unfortunate headshot) is more of a “pure” PR guy than me — he manages to get great media hits for everything from porn distributors to yarnmakers.

Peter’s good, but he also has interesting products and services to pitch to the media. What happens when your product isn’t buzzworthy?

James Archer has some thoughts. And they’re good ones.

James makes several points and it’s a short read — so go read it. The closing graph even has some takeaway for those who market themselves, not just products:

Above all, remember to be fascinating. If your product or service is boring in itself, then it’s up to you — yes, you personally — to be amazing. Everyone can do it, you just have to be the one who actually follows through with it.

25. March 2005

Social networks and the busy professional

Vintage Engage - content from Engage 1.0More than a year ago, I came across Chiristopher Allen’s solid analysis of several social networking sites and bookmarked it; I re-read it today while cleaning out my bookmarks (a singularly post-modern, 21st century drudgery) and pretty much everything he wrote still holds true.

I use LinkedIn (profile here, although I doubt you can view it unless you’re a member), and the basic Cocktail Party Rule applies: If you are polite and know how to gently work a room, you can make some spectacularly useful contacts; if you wander around like a bull in a china shop wondering how many people you can “sell,” then you’re not going to get too far.

On LinkedIn, as with online dating sites and every AOL chatroom ever created, it might be the meek who inherit the earth, but the communicators are going to end up owning the internet.

23. March 2005

Owning the perky-butt niche

Vintage Engage - content from Engage 1.0I don’t post a lot about advertising. This is not because I think it’s unimportant, but because there are a lot of people doing truly great advertising blogs.

But this is too smart to resist.

Retail Store Blog has a great little summary on what makes sexy ads work — and what doesn’t.

The short version of Greg Manter’s three-point test:

  • Do you remember what the ad sold? Or do you only remember the sex?
  • Is the ad “hot” enough to be remarkable (literally)?
  • Is the sexy ad part of a whole brand identity or just a one-off titillation?

Good stuff, and well worth a full read.

16. March 2005

I (heart) FedEx Kinko’s

Vintage Engage - content from Engage 1.0Colin turned my tale of Kinko’s joy into a blog post.

I’d feel left out of my own party if I didn’t link to it.

« Previous Entries   More Entries »